Validación de instrumento con indicadores para software de  dimensionamiento del enfermero en la atención obstétrica  hospitalaria

Inácio Alberto Pereira Costa; Zannis Benevides de Andrade; Maria de Lourdes de Souza

Inácio Alberto Pereira Costa Programa de Posgrado en Enfermería, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (PEN/UFSC). Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil
Zannis Benevides de Andrade Programa de Posgrado en Enfermería, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (PEN/UFSC). Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil
Maria de Lourdes de Souza Programa de Posgrado en Enfermería, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (PEN/UFSC). Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil

Palabras clave: Reducción de Personal, Enfermeras Obstétricas, Estudios de Validación, Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud, Invenciones

Key-words: Personnel Downsizing, Nurse Midwives, Validation Studies, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Inventions

Resumen

Objetivo: Presentar el proceso de construcción y validación de un instrumento con indicadores de gestión para componer el software de dimensionamiento de enfermeros en el parto y posparto. Metodología: compuesto de tres pasos: el primero, definido como construcción del instrumento; el segundo la validación por jueces; el tercero, estructuración final del instrumento y cómputo del Índice de Validez de Contenido y Alfa de Cronbach. Resultados: De los ítems del instrumento con los indicadores aprobados por los especialistas, nueve obtuvieron Índice de Validez de Contenido individual entre 0,75 y 0,92 y tres indicadores con un valor de 1,0, con un IVC total de 0,89. Además el Alfa de Cronbach fue de 0,76. Conclusión: Los resultados obtenidos en la evaluación del Alfa de Cronbach e Índice de Validez de Contenido demuestran una consistencia interna y la fiabilidad del instrumento con 12 indicadores.

Abstract

Objective: To present the process of construction and validation of an instrument with management indicators for composing a software of nurse dimensioning in the delivery and postpartum. Methods: composed of three steps: the first, defined as the construction of the instrument; the second, the validation by judges. The third, composed by final structuring of the instrument and calculation of the Content Validity Index and Cronbach's Alpha. Results: Of the instrument items with the indicators approved by the specialists, nine obtained individual Content Validity Index between 0.75 and 0.92 and three indicators with a value of 1.0, with a total Content Validity Index of 0.89. Conclusions: The results obtained in the evaluation of the Cronbach's Alpha and the Content Validity Index demonstrate an internal consistency and the reliability of the instrument with 12 indicators.

Bibliografía

1. Chaves RRG, Morais e Silva CF, Motta E, Ribeiro EDLM, Andrade YNL. Systematiza-tion of Nursing Care: Overview of Nurses. Rev. Enferm. UFPE. 2016; 10 (4): 1280-1285. Doi: 10.5205/reuol.8464-74011-1-SM.1004201615.
2. Reis TR, Zamberlan C, Quadros JS, Gra-sel JT, Moro ASS. Obstetric Nurses: contri-butions to the objectives of the Millennium Development Goals. Rev. Gaúcha Enferm. 2015; 36(spe): 94-101. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1590/1983- 1447.2015.esp.57393.
3. Aguiar JC, Versiani JCC, Dias CLO, Moreira DC, Andrade DCS, Xavier GC. Care Indicators for Delivery Routes. Rev. Enferm. UFPE. 2018; 2(6): 1674-1680. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963-v12i6a230 890p1674-1680-2018.
4. Fugulin FMT, Lima AFC, Castilho V, Guimarães CP, Carvalho A, Gaidzinski RR. Nursing staff in the internal medicine and surgical units of teaching hospitals: compo-sition and cost. Rev. esc. enferm. USP. 2015; 49(spe2): 48-54. Doi: 10.1590/S0080-6234 20150000800007.
5. Santos FAPS, Enders BC, Brito RS, Farias PHS, Teixeira GA, Dantas DNA, et al. Au-tonomy for obstetric nurse on low-risk childbirth care. Rev. Bras. Saude Mater. Infant. 2019; 19(2): 471-479. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1590/1806-93042019000200012.
6. Barbosa HB, Paiano LAG, Nicola AL, Fernandes LM. Complexity level of patient assessment and the amount of professional nursing. Rev. Enferm. UFSM. 2014; 4(1): 29-37. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/21797692 9230.
7. Vituri DW, Évora YDM. Total Quality Management and hospital nursing: an inte-grative literature review. Rev. Bras. Enferm. 2015 Oct; 68(5): 945-952. Doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/0034-7167.2015680525i.
8. Rossaneis MA, Gabriel CS, Haddad MCL, Melo MRAC, Bernardes A. Health care quality indicators: the opinion of nursing managers of teaching hospitals. Cogitare Enferm. 2015; 20(4): 798-804. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.53 80/ce.v20i4.41734.
9. Lima ES, Cabral BTV, Gondim HMF, Oliveira DA. Validation instrument for assessment of satisfaction level of care in nursing pre-delivery. Enferm. Brasil. 2019; 18(3): 349-358. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33233/eb. v18i3.2164.
10. Vituri DW, Matsuda LM. Content vali-dation of quality indicators for nursing care evaluation. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. 2009; 43(2): 429-437. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1590/S0080-62342009000200024.
11. Melo RP, Moreira RP, Fontenele FC, Aguiar ASC, Joventino ES, Carvalho EC. Criteria for Selection of Experts for Valida-tion Studies of Nursing Phenomena. Rev. Rene. 2011; 12(2): 424-431. Disponible en: http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/425 4/3285 [acceso: 12/07/2019].
12. Bittencourt H R, Creutzberg M, Rodri-gues ACM, Casartelli AO, Freitas ALS. Desenvolvimento e validação de um instru-mento para avaliação de disciplinas na educação superior. Est. Aval. Educ. 2011; 22(48): 91-114. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18222/eae2 24820111994.
13. Medina MG, Silva GAP, Aquino R, Hartz ZMA. Uso de modelos teóricos na avaliação em saúde: aspectos conceituais e operacionais. En: Hartz ZMA, Silva LMV. Orgs. Avaliação em saúde: dos modelos teóricos à prática na avaliação de programas e sistemas de saúde. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2005; 41-63. Doi: 10.7476/9788575415160.
14. Brasil. Agência Nacional de Saúde Complementar (ANS). E-EFI-06: Média de Permanência Maternidade. En: QUALISS - Indicadores Hospitalares Essenciais - 2013/14: Domínio: Eficiência. Rio de Janei-ro: ANS, v. 01, [4f], 2013. Disponible en: http://www.ans.gov.br/images/stories/presta dores/E-EFI-06.pdf [acceso: 15/09/2019].
15. Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). Medidas de Prevenção e Critérios Diagnósticos de Infecções Puer-perais em Parto Vaginal e Cirurgia Cesaria-na/Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Brasília: Anvisa, 2017. Disponible en: https://repositorio.observatoriodocuidado.org/ bitstre-am/handle/handle/1614/Medidas_de_ Pre-vencao_Criterios_Diagnosticos_de_Infec co-es_Puerperais.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed =y [acceso: 16/09/2019].
16 Associação Paulista de Medicina (APM). Conselho Regional de Medicina do Estado de São Paulo (CREMESP). Programa CQH: Compromisso com a Qualidade Hospitalar. São Paulo: Programa CQH, 2009. (3º Caderno de Indicadores). Disponible en: http://www.cqh.org.br/portal/pag/anexos/bai xar.php?p_ndoc=127&p_nanexo=5 [acceso: 14/10/2019].
17. World Health Organization (WHO). Cancer pain relief: with a guide of opiod availabilit. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1996 (2ª ed). Disponible en: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/924154 4821.pdf [acceso: 17/09/2019].
18. Zucchi P, Bittar OJNV, Haddad N. Productivity in teaching hospitals in the state of São Paulo, Brasil. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica. 1998; 4(5): 311-316. Disponible en: https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/rpsp/1998.v4n5/311-316/pt [acceso: 15/09/2019].
19. Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 1955; 101(2): 343-352. Disponible en: http://www2.psych.utoronto.ca/users/peterson /psy430s2001/Miller%20GA%20Magical%20Seven%20Psych%20Review%201955.pdf [acceso: 21/09/2019].
20. Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res. Nursing. Health. 1997; 20(3):269-274. Doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3 269::AID-NUR9 3.0.CO;2-G.
21. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recomendationas. Res. Nurs. Health. 2006; 29(5): 489-497. Doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
22. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16(3): 297-334. Doi:10.1007/ BF02310 555.
23. Pierotti I, Fonseca LF, Nascimento LA, Rossetto EG, Furuya RK. Elaboration, validation and reliability of the safety protocol for pediatric thirst management. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3321. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3 333.3321.
24. Costa TF, Pimenta CJL, Nóbrega MML, Fernandes MGM, Nogueira JA, Costa KNFM. Validation of Bakas Caregiving Outcome scale for brazilian portuguese. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2020; 28:e3249. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.319 1.3249.
25. Montejano-Lozoya R, Gea-Caballero V, Miguel-Montoya I, Juárez-Vela R, Sanjuán-Quiles A, Ferrer-Ferrandiz E. Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2019; 27:e3206. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/15 18-8345.3102.3206.
26. D'Espíndula TS, França BHS. Ethical and bioethical aspects in the research inter-view: the impact on subjectivity. Rev. Bioét. 2016; 24(3): 495-502. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15 90/1983-80422016243149.
27. Mula JM, Auz JV, Navarro PM, Cabas-cango KC, Cabascango CC. Gestión de la calidad de los cuidados de enfermería hos-pitalaria basada en la evidencia científica. Index de Enfermería 2016; 25(3): 151-155. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php? script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-1296201600 0200006&lng=es [acceso: 22/08/20].
28. Oliveira ARS, Araujo TL, Carvalho EC, Costa AGS, Cavalcante TF, Lopes MVO. Construction and validation of indicators and respective definitions for the nursing outcome Swallowing Status. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2015; 23(3): 450-457. Doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0377.2575.
29. Yamada BFA, Santos VLCG. Development and validation of Ferrans & Powers Quality of Life Index - wound version. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. 2009; 43(spe): 1105-1113. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1590/S0080-62342009000500015.
30. Nogueira VO, Cunha ICKO. Validation of competency prole content of nurse managers of higher education. Rev. Cuid. 2018; 9(1): 1998-2006. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/ cuidarte.v9i1.474.
31. Neves T, Rodrigues V, Graveto J, Parreira P. Scale of adverse events associated to nursing practices: a psychometric study in Portuguese hospital context. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2018; 26:e3093. Doi: http://dx. doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2595.3093.
32. Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee S, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research, Social Work Research. 2003; 27(2): 94–104. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ swr/27.2.94.

Validación de instrumento con indicadores para software de dimensionamiento del enfermero en la atención obstétrica hospitalaria

Validation of instrument with indicators for nurse dimensioning software in hospital obstetric care

Resumen

Abstract

Bibliografía